March 28, 2026
Proposed GASB Implementation Guide – Subsidies

Explore the latest proposed GASB implementation guide focused on subsidies, and what it means for proprietary funds. Understand key updates and practical implications for hospitals, universities, and airports.

  • Definition and standardization of subsidies under GASB103

  • Supplemental hospital payments and whether they qualify as subsidies

  • Treatment of scholarship donations and research grants in higher education

  • Classification of airport passenger facility charges as subsidies

  • Reporting and classification of capital and non-capital subsidies

Check out our CPE webcasts for more great training.

Exploring the Proposed GASB Implementation Guide: Subsidies

Welcome back to the Genuine Learning Blog! Today we’re diving into the proposed GASB Implementation Guide, with a special focus on subsidies—a critical topic for CPAs working with proprietary funds, including higher education, hospitals, and airports. Melisa Galasso provides valuable insights into recent standardization and clarification efforts, ensuring consistent reporting and presentation of subsidies across business-type activities.

Understanding the Changes

With GASB103, the financial reporting model saw significant updates, notably in the proprietary funds area. One key change is the standardized definition of subsidies, which affects how organizations such as universities, hospitals, and airports classify and report resource inflows.

To help practitioners navigate these new requirements, GASB has issued a Q&A-style implementation guide, offering practical guidance through real-world scenarios and questions.

Q&A Breakdown: Practical Scenarios

Hospital Supplemental Payments

A common question arose: If a government provides supplemental payments to hospitals beyond standard Medicare-based payments, do these qualify as subsidies? According to the guidance, the answer is yes. Because these supplemental payments are not part of any contractual relationship between patients and the government—they are truly supplemental and not tied to goods or services—they meet the subsidy definition. These funds enable hospitals to keep charges lower than they otherwise would be, providing clarity for firms working heavily in the healthcare sector.

Donations for Scholarships in Higher Education

For higher education institutions, the receipt of donations for scholarships—when donors do not receive goods or services in return—was also addressed. These donations are subsidies, as they help students reduce their financial burden, allowing tuition or other charges to remain lower than without the gift. Even if the institution doesn’t change published tuition rates, the direct and indirect impact of scholarships qualifies as a subsidy.

Research Grants: It Depends

Research grants present a nuanced scenario. If a grant offsets normal operating expenses—such as salaries or lab costs—the funds allow tuition or charges to be lower, thus meeting the subsidy definition. However, if the grant is for incremental costs incurred only because of the grant itself, it does not qualify as a subsidy, since these expenses wouldn’t exist absent the grant.

Taxes Imposed by Business-Type Activities

Another practical question concerns taxes imposed by business-type activities, such as airports. If taxes are received from parties who do not receive goods or services in exchange, they are classified as subsidies. A prime example is the passenger facility charge at airports: these fees are collected from passengers, not for the ticket but for airport projects approved by the Federal Aviation Administration. The resulting funds allow airports to keep their fees to airlines and concessionaires lower, fitting the subsidy definition.

Capital Subsidy Classification

The guide also provides clarity on classification: subsidies other than noncapital subsidies (i.e., capital subsidies) should be reported as other nonoperating revenues and expenses. If resources are limited by the provider specifically for debt service on capital-related debt, those funds must be classified as a capital subsidy due to their restricted use. This aligns with previous GASB guidance.

Key Takeaways and Action Steps

  • The new guidance brings much-needed consistency to how subsidies are defined and reported in proprietary funds.

  • Each scenario requires careful consideration of the underlying substance and the impact on current or future charges.

  • The Q&A format of the guide empowers CPAs to navigate real-world complexities with clarity and confidence.

Participate in the Comment Process

GASB’s implementation guide is currently in proposal form, with opportunities to provide feedback. If you work with affected entities—airports, educational institutions, or hospitals—it’s a great chance to help shape the final guidance by submitting comments.

Jaclyn Veno CPA | Auditing Level Training | CPE

Melisa Galasso, CPA, CSP, CPTD

Melisa F. Galasso is the founder and CEO of Galasso Learning Solutions LLC. A CPA with nearly 20 years of experience in the accounting profession, Melisa designs and facilitates courses in advanced technical accounting and auditing topics, including not-for-profit and governmental accounting.

Her passion is providing high-quality CPE that is meaningful, creates efficiencies and improves quality, and positively impacts ROI. She also supports essential professional development, audit level training, and train the trainer efforts.

Melisa is a Certified Speaking Professional, a Certified Professional in Talent Development (CPTD), and has earned the Association for Talent Development Master Trainer™ designation. Her passion for instructional design and adult learning techniques is one of the differentiators that set her apart from other CPE providers.

She also serves on the FASB’s Not-for-Profit Advisory Committee (NAC), AICPA Council, and the AICPA’s Women’s Initiative Executive Committee (WIEC). She also serves as a Subject Matter Expert for the Center for Plain English Accounting. She previously served on the AICPA’s Technical Issues Committee (TIC), the VSCPA’s Board of Directors, and is a past Chair of the NCACPA’s A&A committee. In addition, Melisa is the author of Money Matters for Nonprofits: How Board Members Can Harness the Power of Financial Statements by Understanding Basic Accounting which is available on Amazon or anywhere you purchase books online.

Melisa received a Top 50 Women in Accounting Award in 2021 by Ignition, is a 2020 Enterprising Women of the Year Award recipient, and was honored as a “40 under 40” by CPA Practice Advisor in 2017, 2018, and 2019. She was also named the 2019 Rising Star by her regional NAWBO chapter, received the Don Farmer award for achievement in technical content instruction, and earned several other awards for public speaking and technical training.